Not once, but twice the William Hawley family was devastated by fire. The logging industry was a primary industry in Northern Michigan in the late 1800s and early 1900s. William Hawley's family was no exception.
William moved his family from upstate New York to Long Rapids Township, Alpena County, Michigan in about 1867.
Although William classifies himself as a farmer on both the 1870 and 1880 US census, his family, being in the mostly unpopulated area of Long Rapids Township, was surrounded by the logging industry
In May of 1874, William was living in Long Rapids Township with his second wife Sara Ann Healy, and their five children; From William's first marriage Franklin Hawley, Charles Hawley, and Minnie Hawley, and from his marriage to Sarah were Ellen and William.
The great influence of people during the logging era, and the large areas of dry pine slash increased both the possibility of fire and the intensity of those which occurred. Many reached tremendous proportions, burning unchecked for weeks or months through slashings, standing timber, cities and settlements, causing human misery, death, and waste. There is evidence to show that these lumbering era fires destroyed more merchantable timber than was cut.[zref]HSRBI9B5[/zref]
On Saturday, May 12th, 1874 tragedy struck William's family in the form of a forest fire.
[zref]"The Fires in Alpena County," Article, Detroit Free Press, Detroit, Wayne, Michigan, 14 May 1874, In the Township of Long Rapids, , p. 1, col. 8;; online images, Newspapers.com (www.Newspapers.com : Downloaded 9 January 2019); https://www.newspapers.com/image/118157662/?terms=The%2BFires%2Bin%2BAlpena%2BCounty%2BHawley.[/zref]
[zref]"Long Rapids," Article, Alpena Argus, Alpena County, Michigan, 13 May 1874, Details about fire at residence of William Hawley Family; online images, Newspapers.com (WWW.Newspapers.com : Viewed 19 April 2021). Page 3.[/zref]
From these two newspaper articles, one from the Detroit Free Press and the other from the Alpena Argus, we learn that William Hawley and his family suffered a catastrophic loss. The family lost two houses, all household goods, two barns, and all that was inside of them.
But even worse than the financial and structural loss was the personal loss. The Hawley family barely escaped with their lives. The children were all injured in some fashion. The heroine of the story is Mrs. Sarah Ann Hawley. While trying to save her son William Martin Hawley who was 10 months old, Sara's dress caught fire and she was only saved by tearing it off.
21 years later, the family was once again devastated by fire. on September 11th, 1898 fire once again destroyed their property. The family was living in Rust Township in the Village of Hillman, Montmorency County, Michigan.
[zref]"Forest Fires in Hillman," Article, Detroit Free Press, Detroit, Wayne, Michigan, 13 September 1895, p. 3, col. 2, William Hawley; online images, Newspapers.com (www.Newspapers.com : downloaded 10 January 2019); https://www.newspapers.com/image/121684334.[/zref]
This time, the fire destroyed the Hawley barn and everything inside it. The total loss caused by the fire, including the Hawley property, was $3,000. That would be a value of $94,598.93 today.
The Hawley family continued living in the Hillman area until about 1909 when they moved back to Alpena County to live in Ossineke. To my knowledge, the eager enemy called fire did not strike the family again.
Background
The first thing I looked at was the birth of the children of Charles 2 and Hattie. Their first child George Russell Hawley was born on April 11, 1913, in Bellflower, Los Angeles, California. This is confirmed based on the marriage record for George.
So it seems that the father of Charles 1, William Hawley, and Charles 2 and Hattie were both living in Bellflower, Los Angeles, California in 1913.
There is one thing that still confuses me a little bit about the birth of George Russell Hawley, the son of Charles 2 and Hattie. If you remember Charles 1 and Sarah Flewelling also had a son named George Russell Hawley, who was born on July 29th, 1902 in Cumming, Ogemaw, Michigan.
My first thought was that these two men might be the same person, but after some research, this doesn't seem to be true.
|
Marriage certificate for George Russell Hawley and Mary Alice Heasley
|
What my father told me...a little sketchy at best...he said Charles was a strange bird...took off with namesake and the girl down the road? ...worked on the Hover Dam...stayed in California...left wife and rest of his kids in Michigan to fend for themselves...I asked him if he took the girl for himself or namesake...dad didn't know...
I asked my dad about it, he said "Uncle Charley ran off with a younger woman to Las Vegas and then moved to California". He said no-one mentioned him again that he remembers.
Everyone has an ancestor who presents a challenge, a mystery waiting to be solved. One such ancestor for me is Charles Hawley, my great granduncle. In the summer of 1910, Charles seemed to drop off the face of the planet.
Today, I am going to share his story in hopes someone out there will be able to help me find him.
|
|
|
The obituary for William Hawley who passed away on August 28th, 1914, states Charles is “living in Buena Park, Orange County, California.”
Bellflower, Los Angeles, California and Buena Park, Orange, California |
|
|
This is where I lose track of Charles. The only indication I have of his death is the obituary of his older brother Frank Hawley.
Frank's obituary states that he has two surviving siblings: Lavina (Hawley) Burt and William Hawley. The obituary does not make any mention of his younger brother Charles. This leads me to believe either the family has lost touch with Charles or he passes away before July 23rd, 1942. |
I mentioned in my last post Finding the Parents of William Hawley... One Step Closer..., that I found my 2nd great grandfather William Hawley in the 1850 census. William was 14 years old and living in the household of John W. Lockwood in Urbana, Steuben County, New York.
As you can imagine, I was very excited to find William in the 1850 census. However, finding him not living with his family, but with another family, at the age of 14, brought up more questions. I started to do some more research into reasons that a boy might not be living with his family at such a young age.
Something I found seemed to be a good possibility. I read a local history book about Steuben County that mentioned a young boy that was "bound out" at a young age to a local tradesman. I wasn't sure exactly what this meant but it made me curious, so time for more research.
Based on my research, when a young child was "bound out", they were basically an indentured servant. This practice was also sometimes called "pauper apprenticeship". This type of arrangement was typically treated as a guardianship in court records. There were many reasons that a child could be "bound out".
Some of the reasons could include:
Based on my research, children were typically bound out at around the age of 14, unless there was a need for them to be placed with a guardian at an earlier age. The guardian was typically responsible for teaching the child a trade and basic literary skills.
So if William was indentured to John Lockwood until the age of 21, as was typical, William should still be able to be found living with or near the Lockwood family at the time of the 1855 New York Census. So I started looking and I believe that I found him.
I found a Wm Haley, age 19 living in the household of Drew Glann in Urbana, Steuben County, New York. Also in the household was Drew's wife Mary and 2 other servants. The two other servants were Sarah Atwell, 23 years old, who had been blind from birth, and a young girl of 3 named Harriet Delong.
Although I had previously assumed that William would already be married and living with his wife Mercy by 1855, this record looked promising. The name was close, the location and the date also seemed correct. But, if William wasn't married yet, why wasn't he still living in the household of John Lockwood and his family?
Remember that we should always use the FAN club methodology when looking for connections in our genealogy. If you read my previous post, you will notice that the Surname Glann sounds familiar. That is because Drew Glann is the brother of Nancy Glann making him the brother in law of John Lockwood, with whom William was living in 1850.
So it appears that sometime between July 21, 1850, and June 21, 1855, William moved from living with John and Nancy to living with Nancy's brother Drew. Based on the 1850 census, Drew and his wife were married in 1850. The census also states that Drew is a farmer. My thought is that Drew may have needed help on the farm or building a new homestead for himself and his new bride and William moved in to help out or continue his apprenticeship.
Steuben county did keep very good records for these guardianship agreements, which can be found online. I have spent the last few days looking for a record regarding William but have not yet found one. I have read that legal guardianship records were not always recorded if it was an agreement between the child's parents and the guardian. I will keep looking.
In the mean time, I believe that it is possible that something happened early in William's life that made it necessary for him to be bound out at a young age. Based on what I already know of William and his life in Michigan, it appears that he learned the trade of farming from John Lockwood and his family and went on to continue in this line of work for the rest of his life.
Thank you for following along on my journey to get to know my 2nd great-grandfather William Hawley. I have a feeling there will be a few more interesting stops just around the bend.
In a previous post called, Re-thinking Research: The Parents of William Hawley, I made the claim that William C. Hawley and Mary Oakley were not the parents of my 2nd great grandfather William Hawley. I used several methods to help back up this claim including a timeline comparison of the lives of my ancestor William and the son of William C. Hawley and Mary Oakley.
Since that time, I have been trying to find William's parents. Here is a list of some of the clues to his birthplace, which I hope will lead me to his parents.
2. In Book J (1872 - 1905) of Early Members of the Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints William's birthplace is listed as Urbana, Steuben, New York
This was the point I was at when I started my research, a few days ago, into the birthplace and parents of William Hawley. My plan was to re-analyze each piece of evidence that I had already collected about William, hoping to find a clue that I had previously missed. I have spent several hours doing this over the last few weeks.
I found a few interesting facts that I hadn't yet documented, but nothing largely relevant to my search for his parents. So, as I do occasionally when feeling a little frustrated, I decided to do a few "blind searches". What I mean by this is, that I don't necessarily have a specific fact or even person that I'm looking for. I may focus on a historical event or a specific location, just to see if something jumps out at me.
Finding the information in this book, led me to decide to do a "blind search" for census records in and around 1850 for Steuben County, New York. The only search criteria I added was the location and date range.
Why did I share so much of my research process? Because it led me to find something significant. Something that I feel will help me make progress in confirming William's birthplace and finding his parents.
This is what I found. A fourteen-year-old boy named William Holly is recorded as living in the household of John Lockwood and his family in Urbana, Steuben County, New York. The head of Household is John Lockwood, born in about 1823. John is a farmer living with his wife Nancy and 3 children; Bradley (3), Celecta (2) and Franklin (2 months).
This find in itself was very exciting and closer than I had ever gotten before. However, it was not enough to have me doing the "genealogy happy dance" just yet. Although I will admit, my feet were tapping along to that beat.
Genealogist Elizabeth Shown Mills coined a phrase that explains a genealogy methodology called
the "FAN Club."
She points out the significance of not only searching records for an ancestor's surname but also paying attention to documents about the ancestor's "FAN Club" (Friends, Associates, Neighbors), thereby broadening the scope of research beyond an individual to the community and nation where he or she lived. Learning more about an ancestor's FAN Club is a great way to discover new information about your direct ancestry, as these people are often listed together in deeds, wills, court cases, road orders, etc., and help you build a stronger case about relationships in your own family. - Elizabeth Shown Mills
Below is the 1880 Census for Wilson Township, Alpena County, Michigan showing William Hawley and his family, living next store to Charles and Frank Hawley (Sons of William and Mercy) and Wesley and Adelia Jaynes. Wesley was a part of William's FAN Club.
I found several Jaynes families living in Urbana in 1850, but not a Wesley Jaynes. I decided to widen my search to the whole county of Steuben. Imagine my surprise when I came across a Wesley Jaynes (spelled Janes), living about 20 miles from Urbana
Below is the 1850 Census showing Wesley Jaynes living, with his family, in Cambell, Steuben, New York. This further confirms the connection between William Holly, living in Urbana in 1850 and William Hawley living in Alpena in 1880.
Ok.... just so you know... right about now I AM DOING THE "GENEALOGY HAPPY DANCE"!!!
To Summarize, based on records previously found, I was pretty confident that William Hawley was born in or around Steuben County, New York in August of 1836. By 1860, William was living in Livingston County, New York with his wife Mercy and two sons Franklin and Charles.
Although this is just one census record, it provides me with enough information to remove one more brick in the wall that I have been chipping away at for years. It is moments like this that continue to make my journey to discover my ancestors so rewarding.
I will continue to share my finding as I search for the parents of William Hawley.
I'm not quite sure what my 2nd great grandfather William Hawley was doing out in a blizzard that evening, but he did make it home, even without the help of others.
What I found interesting, was that it must have been a fairly significant event to be included in two different newspapers, hundreds of miles from where it occurred. I wonder who it was that refused him shelter. How did they feel about this newspaper write up?
Although this news article will not help me bust through any genealogical brick walls, it was a very interesting find. Newspapers articles like this, help to provide a better understanding of the people behind the pedigree chart.
1860 US Federal Census - Bridget Faught and Children
|
Marriage record for George Faught and Elizabeth Miller
|
Mary Anna Faught was born in Bridgehampton, Sanilac, Michigan on January 18, 1870, the first and only child of George Faught and Elizabeth Miller. The family was enumerated on the 1870 census living in Bridgehampton. George is a farmer and Elizabeth is at home keeping house and taking care of her daughter, Mary Anna, who would be almost 7 months old by this time.
for Mary Anna Faught who is now living in Long Rapids, Alpena, Michigan with her grandparents, her mother's parents, Phillip and Sarah Miller. I don't know for sure why Mary Anna is no longer living with her father George, but I can only assume that he didn't feel like he could take care of a young daughter after his wife passed away.
It seems that Mary Anna continued to live with her grandparents until she met and married Alexander Orlando McKenzie on March 22, 1889, in Long Rapids, Alpena, Michigan.
Alexander and Mary Anna moved to Atlanta, Montmorency, Michigan and had 8 children over the next 16 years.
Unfortunately, on November 8, 1907, tragedy struck again and Alexander passed away at the age of 56, leaving Mary Anna with 7 children, the youngest child, Edward, being just over a year old.
Mary Anna (Faught) McKenzie, my second great grandmother, must have been one tough lady. But, don't worry about her! She was found in the 1910 census, running the family farm.